Sometimes, you pick up words so alien that you end up replacing the regular word, like domicile.
"Welcome to my domicile where we can refresh with our favorite inebriants and watch fellow humans engage in roughhousing with opposing humans. We can provide praise to the successors and belittle their counterparts!"
Your observation touches on a transformative shift in our perception and interaction with content in the digital age. The proliferation of advanced AI technologies, especially those capable of generating text, images, videos, and even audio, has indeed sparked a new form of skepticism among many users.
This change can have both positive and negative implications:
Positive Aspects
Critical Thinking: [on and on]
I understand your concern. The increasing presence of AI-generated content online has understandably led to some wariness and skepticism, as people want to be able to distinguish between human-created and AI-generated information. However, I would caution against overgeneralizing or assuming that anything slightly unusual is necessarily non-human.
Creativity, unique perspectives, and novel ideas are not the sole domain of humans. As AI systems become more advanced, they are able to generate content that can be just as original, thought-provoking, and compelling as human-created work. [on and on]
The robots have weighed in, and they get it - but don’t be too hasty or ignore the positives!
I think OP might’ve been written by a creative writer. Wonder if we’ll still care ten years from now. Or care more…
So the reason I asked was more the fact I have seen two of the same templates using Zuck just today so it made me wonder if it was a new trend, rather than a role creator.
Not that I decided one way or the other how it was made.
It’s all true. The bird muscle, the animal flesh, the carcasses and the propensity of humans to cook it so we can tolerate eat it. This is unlike obligate carnivores like our cats which enjoy ripping the flesh off the bone with their teeth and eating the bird muscle right off the fresh carcass.
The reason we cook meat is not that we would otherwise be unable to process the nutrients, it's to save ourselves from getting worms and parasites. In contrast to humans, wild animals are often infested with them and if they knew how to make fire and cook, I'm sure your cat would do barbecues as well because it's just better to not get sick.
If this style of writing is your thing, there's a webcomic/book by Nathan Pyle that you would like. Here's his website if you want to check his social media.
Fellow humans should I finish the bird muscle with a saccharine concoction, an overfermented grape extract concoction, or a ground plant concoction from the geographic region of Carolina? I know us fellow humans frequently debate the proper and just pairing of concoction and flesh.
Thanks for clarifying for those of us who weren't sure. You never know what the side effects of tiger blood and enough cocaine to kill a small horse might be 🤷
That kid is an alien, the goofy look is cuz he's about to meepmeep across the desert at the end of the movie. But what movie? its been awhile...Maaan is been awhile. Did it star Christian Slater? Was he a seti scientist? Was it a climate message movie? I need a minute...
EDIT: Haha as other poster said, it stars Charlie Sheen who for some reason i always get mixed up with Slater. So close... (not close)
You ever see someone do something they have been doing wrong for years and have missed important aspects that concern safety because they learned how to do it from analyzing a database entry on the subject instead of being taught by someone passing down generations of experience shaped through past failures? Because you have.
Yes of course. I am human after all and I do not have any thermal imaging equipment installed in my human retinas. That would be perplexing wouldn’t it?
It looks like he's smoking a load of meat, given the smoke and the dangle of temp proves at the bottom. It's not likely for the BBQ to be that hot, relatively speaking - maybe 250F but probably lower.
It's impossible to tell without knowing the focal length of the lens used. Different camera lenses can make things appear closer or further to each other than they actually are.
I think some portions of the company do want to buy these studios to make games. Mostly because they need a regular funnel of titles to put on Game Pass, and the best way to do that is small- to mid-budget games that can generate hype. But then other portions of the company want to chase that big AAA paycheck because big numbers look good, even if ROI isn't as good for that one game versus 3 or 4 smaller titles. And others still only care about what will make the balance sheet look the best for the quarter.
Even smaller companies end up with various "factions" within the org as far as vision and how to best create success (or even how to define success); a company like Microsoft is so fractured that different divisions are unaware of each other's goals and have competing interests.
I'm not trying to defend Microsoft here, I just think this is a consequence of an overly large organization that doesn't have unified goals.
This has been my thought every time I see a post about them shuttering studios. They're just killing competition. But for what? They aren't producing quality themselves, so just to leave the field empty?
programming.dev
Heiß