Wie jetzt? Ich dachte immer alle sind gleich... Also müssen auch alle die gleichen Chancen haben. Und es bedarf keiner individuellen Förderung. Stimmt das etwa nicht?
Nothing about nuclear energy production is good, sensible and safe! You are dependent on a finite resource, you have to put in an incredible amount of effort to keep it running. Not to mention the damage caused by a malfunction (see Fukushima and Chernobyl).
What are you even talking about?!?! There is so much uranium in the world. Even if we completely switched over to nuclear power and without improvements in Nuclear tech, our sun would have fizzled out and we still would have uranium left.
Uranium is more abundant than silver and we don't need much to power a nuclear reactor.
And yet we would still be dependent on an industry, just as we are today on coal, gas and oil.
I like how people take Fukushima and Chernobyl as examples for disasters. Please go look up how many people have died from those disasters. Please go check. I'll wait.
As others have already answered: far more people died than you claim here! How much land was made uninhabitable for centuries? How many animals would have to die? How much food would have to be destroyed because it was contaminated?
What happens if a tsunami hits an offshore wind farm? They collapse... And then? Do they have to be rebuilt?But you can do that because the land has not been contaminated
Furthermore, any energy production that has the potential to injure, harm or kill thousands of people cannot be considered safe. Just because nothing has happened so far.
ich iel
Bildung: Schulnoten werden von Geschlecht, Gewicht und Herkunft beeinflusst ( www.spektrum.de )
Lindner gibt rechtem Hetzblatt Exklusivinterview
Nuclear isn't perfect, but it is the best we have right now. ( lemmy.world ) Englisch
Immunität von AfD-Politiker Bystron erneut aufgehoben ( www.tagesschau.de )