Can anybody explain the difference to the Foreign Agents Registration Act in the USA and why one (America’s of course) is within Western democratic values and the other is not?
I think it’s a quite valuable information which countries are taking part in the opinion forming in my country and on who's side of the political spectrum in my country they’re acting on.
I just read a lot of articles about the Russian Law in Western media and not one mentions its similarities to the American law.
I know that Russia puts a lot of effort into supporting rightwing and leftwing organizations in the Western world. Although it’s disgusting I understand that it’s in their interest. They are definitely not the good ones and it’s our task to stop that influence.
I am sure that we are doing the same all over the world but nobody’s talking about except Russia. We are not the good ones, too.
Just found this interesting background explainer article about the Bill: "In Georgia, Russian émigrés see familiar Kremlin tactics" france24 art
" This law is reminiscent of legislation that came into force in Russia about ten years ago which initially targeted human rights NGOs financed by Western countries and gradually turned into a powerful tool of political repression."
The bill, passed Tuesday, requires media, nongovernmental organizations and other nonprofit groups to register as “pursuing the interests of a foreign power” if they receive more than 20% of their funding from abroad.
Wow i wonder why western MIM cares so much about it
It’s great that she’s gonna veto a bad bill, but isn’t it counterproductive to democracy if a president can just veto what the parliament does? Like one person holding the power of a whole parliament?
I think it's supposed to act as a soft power veto by sending the bill back for one more reading. Unfortunately soft power is not a thing in ex-Eastern bloc countries
I think usually something like that is intended to as a counterweight, to prevent power from centralising.
However, to prevent the scales from tipping too badly, a sufficient majority in parliament can override the veto, and I believe the party that's pushing this (Georgian Dream) has enough seats to be able to do this.
(Caveat: I'm not Georgian, so this is just based on somewhat above average interest in politics and in the country, following my local news.)
Once vetoed the bill goes back to the legislative branch, where they can overrule a veto if it reaches a certain supermajority. Or they could change it and send it back up the line as a new bill
In an interview with The Associated Press, Zourabichvili harshly criticized the ruling Georgian Dream party for pushing the bill that also is widely seen setting back Georgia’s aspirations to join the European Union.
The bill, passed Tuesday, requires media, nongovernmental organizations and other nonprofit groups to register as “pursuing the interests of a foreign power” if they receive more than 20% of their funding from abroad.
Huge crowds of protesters have blocked streets in the capital of Tbilisi and milled angrily outside the parliament building after lawmakers approved the measure 84-30 despite strong criticism from the U.S and the EU.
The opposition has denounced the bill as “the Russian law” because Moscow uses similar legislation to crack down on independent news media, nonprofits and activists critical of the Kremlin.
Zourabichvili emphasized that after Georgia received the status of a candidate last fall to join the EU, the government should have focused on passing the necessary laws to qualify for the launch of accession talks at the end of the year.
Zourabichvili said it’s hard to say whether the bill was the ruling party’s initiative or if Moscow had played any role in its passage, but she emphasized that the Kremlin is unhappy with Georgia’s pro-Western aspirations.
The original article contains 764 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
BRUSSELS (AP) — European Union nations reached a tentative breakthrough deal to provide Ukraine with billions in additional funds for arms and ammunitions coming from the profits raised from frozen Russian central bank assets held in the bloc.
The agreement among the 27 EU ambassadors was announced by Belgium, which holds most of the frozen assets in the bloc.
It came after weeks of tough negotiations among member states, which were made more complicated by the stringent financial limits on using such funds.
Kyiv has long been urging that those funds be used to get vital military supplies as it struggles to stave off renewed Russian attacks.
A small group of member states, especially Hungary, refuse to supply weapons to Ukraine so special safeguards had to be included in the deal to allow for some 10% of the funds to be considered general aid.
Best buddies, agreeing on the absence of free press,absolute control and stealing and skimming money from people. They'll probably just compare their bankaccounts and tip each other off for new" business ventures/ annexations, and how to farm the world of its resources in 80 days" idk. Got carried away.
It is explained later in video - the cop describes how the dog reacts when it smells drugs - by barking and scratching. Sorry, there is no English version...
It feels good prescribing shitty opinions onto others so that your own seems vaguely less horrid in comparison, huh? Not very useful for anything but feeding brainworms though.
apnews.com
Heiß