Ich meine abgesehen davon dass der Bundesnchrichtendienst nichts ohne die NSA auf die Reihe bringt, macht es doch Sinn die Daten von der NSA nehmen die die ohnehin bei uns sammeln.
Nur weil wir nicht mehr mit denen zusammen arbeiten werden die nicht weniger bei uns Überwachen.
Aber dass der BND das auch selbst können sollte wäre schon ein Ziel das wir verfolgen sollten.
(Ich habe zu jeder Partei hier ein paar mäßig lustige Anmerkungen gemacht. Falls jemand ernsthaft was über die Parteien wissen will, aber keinen Bock hat, alle Programme zu lesen.)
Um es zusammenfassen also: 70% Parteien die so bedeutungslos sind, dass das finden ihrer Position mehr Zeit in Anspruch nehmen wird als man in der Schlange vom Wahlbüro stand.
15% populistische Parteien, mit Recht guten Chancen, die alle den gleichen von Russland/China finanzierten Wagen reiten.
Die letzten 15% sind Pest oder Cholera.
Ich bleibe dabei, meine europäische Stimme ist ideologisch geprägt. Wie viel Sinn das hat weiß ich nicht, aber noch ist das EP ja nicht direkt für unsere Zukunft verantwortlich
What is it with these commie types that they believe communism will leave everyone to become hippies who can do whatever they want and all required resources just magically arrive when they need.
It really is watching children believe in Santa Claus
Comrade, we all know lead poisoning and the need for safety gear are capitalist propaganda! Now, get back in the mines! Production must increase 50% this year, and your state-appointed union representative says it can!
Capital successfully fought to put lead into American's blood and lungs for a century after it was known to be poison. To this day they're still fighting to keep it there.
And this isn't whataboutism (not that it matters). The first commenter ridiculed socialism by using a hypothetical scenario. The second commenter showed with evidence this hypothetical scenario is actually real under capitalism.
EDIT: based on another commenter, OP's claim isn't even factual.
And it took the US until 1996 (after fall of USSR)? Not to mention that it was capitalism (General Motors) that spread the hoax about leaded gasoline being safe, under the guise of scientific research in 1921.
The first commenter is talking a hypothetical scenario of socialism being bad, so the second commenter (the one you responded to) responded with actual example of that same hypothetical scenario happening, but except by a capitalist power (the US). I don't think your response makes sense at all here.
No, his response is calling out the whataboutism fallacy. The US doing something bad does not in any way, shape, or form make socialism any less shitty. It's poking fun at the delusional people who still think it's a good ideology despite the overwhelming evidence.
No, you're just an idiot. Whataboutism is simply a fallacy. It doesn't infer anything outside of inconsistent logic. If you feel threatened by it then it just shows that you're disingenuous.
Meme aside, there is no justification for doing that. Even if I saved up my own money, I wouldn't get an extravagant hobby when others at home are starving. It's just asking for trouble.
A $1999 pc, sure. But not $2000! That's just too much.
i.ibb.co
Heiß