karolherbst

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@ljrk yeah, though in git it's just weird, because there are still important projects using email based workflows and ahhhhhhh

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@Man2Dev sure, but an email is entirely irrelevant to the hole signing stuff thing.

Sure it's based on gpg now, but it totally doesn't have to, and it's also entirely irrelevant which email address an identity uses here either.

Could also say "email makes sense because we used to use mailing lists", but the point is: most don't and having an email there is kinda besides the point where people really use other means of communication these days.

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@neobrain wait what? 🙃

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@aitorpazos I'm not saying there shouldn't be a way of communicating. But like the email doesn't have to be in the git repository.

If you use a git forge you still have an account and can enforce whatever policy you have, but this way you can e.g. make email only visible to maintainers of the project and things like that.

And if somebody doesn't want to be reached by email that's an entirely fair request and should be respected.

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@raimue that's like entirely irrelevant for code in a git repo?

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@raimue yeah, but then we can just remove it from the repo and link to the account identity in the git forge.

And if projects really want to require emails, then they can just tell users to add it to there git user.name thing.

Just if your workflow is all on a git forge and not via email, then the CLI tool saying "but you have to set your email" might make people disclose their email even if they don't really want to and even if the project doesn't care at all.

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@Man2Dev I don't see how it's relevant where you are using your email elsewhere honestly.

For all I care a single person can use how many identities they like to contribute to projects. What matters is that it's the same identity doing it in the future.

There are other ways of signing content which isn't tied to an email.

The main reason git is doing it via email is, because when it was written, the email workflow was basically the only relevant one at that time.

But now we have 2024.

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@aitorpazos Why is the email relevant in the first place?

As a maintainer all I care about is to communicate on submitted code.

After the code is merged, it's my responsibility as a maintainer to react on bugs/issues created by code from other/new contributors.

I might reach out to the original contributor, but I don't have to and if they were one time contributors I'd have to fix it myself anyway.

And you usually know how to reach out maintainers, even if it's not in git.

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@Man2Dev I think you simply overestimate how relevant the email bit there is.

Nobody really cares about linking identity across repositories. And almost nobody cares about signing commits and it doesn't even change a bit besides inconveniencing myself.

Signed tags, I agree, but that's a maintainers job to do, not drive-by contributors.

And the identity part can be part of the signing feature, doesn't have to require an email in every commit.

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@forestjohnson maybe it would be better to update whenever a new version is there and just verify it works and if not, just roll it back?

Could be easier to do, because then I just need to target the live system with some curl commands to check if everything comes up and if not, I just roll it all back.

There is no state anyway, because the docker-compose I have here is simply deploying reverse nginx proxies. But my Vaultwarden is proxied there so I don't want it to break randomly

karolherbst , vor 2 Monaten

@astrid the modern solution to this problem is obviously to have an AI knowing how to invoke help for a certain tool and....

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@psy I want to catch everything coming from internal or external (wan and lan in openwrt) targeting my external IP and port forward it (e.g. 443 -> 8443).

My openwrt setup is silly and the image force enables port 443 on the web frontend which I want to get around.

Maybe a firewall rule ain't the greatest idea here.

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@Man2Dev yes, but I still have to set up a firewall rule for reasons not important here.

connections to external IP at port_a -> somewhere else at port_b

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@Man2Dev yeah, but I'm hosting something at home, so that's why I have this problem.

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@Man2Dev sure, but this is all running on my router and I need to redirect stuff hitting my router, because it's the target of my external IP, but it also starts a service at port 443, which I want to get around.

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@Man2Dev sure, but how would that help if my phone targets my external IP at port 443 from inside my home network, if the service I actually want to target does not run on my router at port 443?

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@Man2Dev yes, and for port forwarding I either have to specify a fixed target IP (which is dynamic, because it's my external IP given by my ISP) or redirect all traffic (breaking internet access)

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

I found a different solution where I mess with the package manager to prevent it from writing a file breaking my setup 🙃

karolherbst , vor 2 Monaten

@Lyude apparently "auto-completion" 🤓

karolherbst , vor 2 Monaten

@Lyude wait.. people approach you to talk about systemd?

karolherbst , vor 2 Monaten

@Lyude works here, but the flatpak was last update a month ago or so?

karolherbst , vor 2 Monaten

@Lyude I get the same message though and I would be surprised if that's the reason for it not working for you

karolherbst , vor 2 Monaten

@sludgegirl I hope it has nothing to do with me talking about it recently 🙃

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@herrorange depends on the driver honestly. But yeah.. I think I wouldn't have considered it ready before 24.0 myself.

But yeah... can just report those issues and I'd need to fix them, but there are a couple of people having a relatively good experience with it so far.

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@darktable yeah, so I've heard 🙃 But my main motivation here would be to get more testing, especially while mesa is still in RC, to fix things before they hit the release.

But yeah.. I've just fixed another bug hit with Darktable this week

karolherbst , vor 2 Monaten

@gfxstrand might be a fun idea to figure out if it's deterministic which thread writes the value.

karolherbst , vor 2 Monaten

@gfxstrand sure, but what if only ever the first thread in the subgroup, not the first thread of active ones writes the value?

Then it still wouldn't help, but at least we would know what the rules are.

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

worst python ever: https://gist.github.com/karolherbst/e37f4fc2324eab6f22cd4cc90db543de

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

108 🙃 HOW

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

anyway, need to change your domain and acct name, and need a development token (ignore the redirect URI part) and set the read scope and off you go.

It's the worst kind of code with the worst kind of way of doing this, but sorts all your followers by instance name excluding your own, because apparently that misses the instance part and I was lazy)

and yeah.. that's mastodon only, maybe it works on forks.. probably.

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

oh no.. there are good people on there...

karolherbst OP , vor 2 Monaten

@oblomov @ihabunek ohh.. maybe. Didn't know of that client. Maybe I should check that out

karolherbst , vor 2 Monaten

@pocketvj @okias @williamtries freedreno or msm

karolherbst , vor 2 Monaten

@okias @williamtries maybe we should just merge freedreno support at this point, because it's still not upstream?