austincnunn , vor 15 Tagen

@foone doesn't that only matter if you're using it for commercial works?

foone OP , vor 15 Tagen

@austincnunn Nah. GPL doesn't know or care about "commercial"

funkylab , vor 17 Tagen

@foone the graphical representation is at the very most an output of the SVG program, if we really want to call it that. So, not a problem.

curtmack , vor 17 Tagen

@foone My interpretation is that A) tattooing does not qualify as "Linking" under the GPL's definition, and B) even if it did, the person's body would qualify under the System Library exception. As such, there wouldn't be an issue, provided the tattoo artist gave the recipient a copy of the GPL and the Corresponding Source for the artwork (or a written offer to receive the Corresponding Source through some other means, for free or for a fee no greater than their cost to perform this service).

swelljoe , vor 17 Tagen

@foone what constitutes "distributing" a tattoo? Because that's where the license kicks in with GPL.

foone OP , vor 17 Tagen

@swelljoe I think I might have to license all my selfies as GPL

slyecho , vor 17 Tagen

@foone Only on arm architecture

foone OP , vor 17 Tagen

I was about to do a temporary tattoo shitpost and I discovered that there's like 50 wikipedia pages embedding a broken SVG.

even when I try not to Do Work, I end up having to do work

h0m54r , vor 17 Tagen

@foone apologies if it’s one of mine

waldi , vor 17 Tagen

@foone You have to stop using anything electronic, then you might be able to stop doing work.

frederic , vor 17 Tagen

@foone Do you have to tattoo the LICENSE file next to it? 🤔