96VXb9ktTjFnRi ,

Are arguments really that bad? I think this is a rather cynical point of view. I don't want to reach this stage.

Soulcreator ,

Friendly debates can be a healthy thing. Angry, heated, bitter arguments? Yeah, I'd argue they aren't too great for your mental health.

96VXb9ktTjFnRi ,

That's true, but if you're letting it get to angry heated bitter arguments, that's at least partly your fault. With an open mind and a friendly attitude you can mostly avoid those.

HEXN3T ,
@HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Oops! All Doublespeak

jsomae ,

This may explain why everyone likes him

tacosplease ,

That's probably not a bad approach in general, but sometimes shit matters.

PersnickityPenguin ,

Well, he is an actor...

Now you have an engineer do that. Boeing?

mrgreyeyes ,

Engineer: "If speed == slow, do nose down"

QA engineer: "But what if the not redundant sensor if faulty?"

Engineer: "Good is good enough, I have more to do and deadlines to catch"

QA engineer: "You're absolutely correct, ENJOY!"

Senal ,

Your missing the part in the middle where you spend 6 months telling them in no uncertain terms that the thing they are asking is stupid and will not work properly/safely.

Various back and forth emails, a completely "justified" performance review program because of your "falling standards" and several meetings with various managers at different levels of "importance".

Also the "You're absolutely correct, ENJOY" is written at the bottom of your resignation letter or told to them directly in your "redundancy" exit interview.

darkpanda ,

He’d get along well with Terrance Howard.

Letstakealook ,

I really like this and will embrace it going forward. I have nothing to gain by engaging with nonsense.

jh29a ,

is that next level Bionic Reading?

sirico ,
@sirico@feddit.uk avatar

Wait that 5 is a float and hasn't been declared!

quafeinum ,

Someone is surely gonna use it later

LittleBorat2 ,

In a real job you suffer the consequences of letting something stupid happen.

Samsy OP ,

Only the stupidity that affects your work directly.

LittleBorat2 ,

More things are a boomerang than you think.

Samsy OP ,

Australian mythbusters: let's check this out.

Jokes aside, I think you are right.

redisdead ,

Yes and no. Sometimes letting someone be stupid means they're quickly replaced by someone hopefully less stupid.

MeowZedong ,
@MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml avatar

Unless they're your manager. Then they stay forever or get promoted.

jubilationtcornpone ,

What happens when the stupid person is in charge of hiring?

redisdead ,

They hired you, didn't they?

trolololol ,

Then they hire someone more stupid so they can appear to be smart. Which makes it a smart move, which means they're smart.

terminhell ,

Pff, past jobs I've been at, you got written up for not doing the stupid thing(policy related, nothing that would put you in actual danger).

CylustheVirus ,

Right, so there's very few middle management or C Suite jobs, got it.

exanime ,

True, but I don't think Keanu here is giving career advancement advice

lugal ,

But 1+1 is 5. I'm sick and tried of people pretending 1+1=1. The sum is always bigger than each of their addends. How do people not get that

example ,

it's clearly 3, stop spreading misinformation

lugal ,

Let's just agree that it's an odd number

deadbeef79000 ,

... For sufficiently large values of 1.

CylustheVirus ,

Many such cases.

Swarfega ,

I've always been like this. Sadly my wife finds controversy at every turn and I get dragged in.

pseudonym ,

John Fick

grue ,

Do you want a fascist dicatorship? 'Cause letting assholes be dangerously wrong without pushback is how you get a fascist dictatorship.

Steve ,

How do you know? Its not like we are living in this situation right now

rustydrd ,
@rustydrd@sh.itjust.works avatar

You know what, you're absolutely correct. Enjoy!

Steve ,

Hey

abrinael ,

I have MAGA family members and it’s not just 1+1=5. It’s a word-vomit tsunami of absolute bullshit. And if you convince them that point 1/367 is not factual, they won’t accept that it disqualifies anything else (including the idea that he never tells lies), and you will have to re-prove that point 1/367 is not factual a few weeks later. It’s exhausting, and I’m fairly sure that is the point (and I’m fairly sure this is also an actual Russian propaganda technique called a “firehose of falsehoods”, regardless of whether it’s being used in that context).

grue ,

That's when it's time to shame, ridicule, ostracize, and exile. People like that do not deserve the benefits of living in a society.

Facebones ,

Thats our national issue, democrats care far less about the fascist vomit of the right than they do being polite, "understanding," and "reaching across the aisle."

J6ers tried to overtake the govt, hang em for treason. If their backers violently rise up, take em out too. Problem solved. Instead, dems make excuses for Republicans every day, say they can't do anything about anything, then push a bunch of policies to further snuff out the left instead.

crusa187 ,

Democratic politicians feel this way because they are mostly friends with their colleagues across the aisle. They all eat at the same luncheons together, hang out at the same establishments in DC, attend the same fundraisers and lobbying events.

I think the voters tend to have a different point of view from those in DC. Consider that even Republican lawmakers were running for their life on Jan6. Dem voters are growing fatigued with the constant gaslighting from the establishment politicians, and hopefully soon might provide cause for their “elected representatives” to flee as well. At this point we’ve been left with painfully few alternatives.

Lastly just want to say I do agree with full treason charges for anyone involved with Jan6. Obstruction was a laughable wrist slap, this is far too serious for such measures. The rioters kind of had the right idea but for literally all of the wrong reasons. It’s tea party republicans all over again (which was funded by Koch bros of course). Instead of addressing this in a serious manner, Dems considered doing nothing at all for 2 years before they finally started bringing the wrong charges. Pathetic.

someguy3 ,

They reach across the aisle because they basically never have control of Congress. Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, and Senate) to pass anything. When they don't have all 3, they have to reach across the aisle to pass anything. So guess how long they've had all 3? They've had it for 4 years of the last 24 years.

And if they didn't reach across, guess what happens. The GOP shuts down the government like they did to Obama.

So what can you do move things left? Give Dems consistent and overwhelming victories in all 3 houses.

Facebones ,

Rewarding them for moving further right hasn't worked for decades, but surely it will this time!

There's a reason they cant pull the votes to get all 3, turns out the people voting for Republicans aren't going to switch parties cause dems chase after them year after year abandoning anyone left of mid right establishment dems.

someguy3 ,

Everytime the Dems lose, they go to the center to find votes. And they find them! That's how Bill Clinton won, he went to the center (some say right, whatever). Gore went a little left and then lost. So Obama learned to not run left and instead ran on broad "hope". His reward for passing the ACA was losing Congress for his last 6 years. Thanks voters. Clinton went a little left on climate change, supposedly the important issue for the left, and lost. So Biden learned to not run left, and he won!

Every time the Dems go left they lose. So they go to the center to find voters and they find them. And you wonder why they go to the center?

Facebones ,

Every time the Dems go left they lose

I'm sure it has nothing to do with immediately abandoning those talking points once they're elected. A single Republican gripes and "well there's nothing we can do we're just doing their thing now. Sucks to suck 🤷‍♂️"

Of course, as illustrated here they're happy to blame the left though even though their entire thing is "fuck the left." whether its outright like it is right now, or the passive "WE'LL TOTALLY DO LEFT STUFF GUYS JUST VOTE FOR US.......whoops sorry someone said no so we're conservatives now"

someguy3 , (Bearbeitet )

Is this the conversation where I said dems have had control for 4 years of the last 24 years? Yeah it is. Dude they are forced to reach across the aisle. Because they have lost control for 20 years of the last 24 years. That's how Congress works, if you don't have all 3 then you are forced to reach across the aisle and compromise. I'll say it again, forced to. Because left voters never show up.

No matter how much you gripe, that's how it works. So if you want them to do left things, then give them all 3 (presidency, house of reps, and Senate) consistently and overwhelmingly. It's that simple.

(Want to go back further and include Bill Clinton? Then Dems have had control for 6 years of the last 32. Want to include Bush senior and Reagan? Then it's 6 years of the last 44 fucking years. Read that again: Dems have had control for 6 measly years of the last 44 fucking years. And you wonder why we have slow progress?)

TunaCowboy ,

Sometimes I just agree with people so they can stop talking.

-Jet Li

lugal ,

True

Gemini24601 ,
@Gemini24601@lemmy.world avatar

This is O’Brien type stuff

  • Alle
  • Abonniert
  • Moderiert
  • Favoriten
  • random
  • memes@lemmy.ml
  • haupteingang
  • Alle Magazine