I am debating mint vs arch. It's been a minute since I fucked around with arch. Dunno if I want to "get into it" with arch or just do a plug'n play distro and take it from there.
I need to gtfo before Win 11 comes crashing down on my life.
I am also an on/off Linux user since Debian. Windows 10 has been fine for me and I would live here forever in the blissful ignorance of OS apathy but when support for it stops in 2025 and I am force marched into the Windows 11 I may jump ship and run off into the wilds of Linux again.
If 10% of newb questions were just answered plainly in forums then google would index those and these easy solutions would be actually google-able. Nerds gatekeeping basic info by forcing people deep into man pages to find the needle in the haystack argument that is used for 99% of commands surrounded by a bajillion arguments that are basically dev-tools used for bash scripts make adopting to a CLI mega frustrating.
Most forum advice is about obscure driver issues for some random piece of hardware or "help! update broke my shit" type of posts.
Arch has the best documentation. Most documentation is either too dumbed down or too advanced. Arch documentation splits the difference and gives you basic information along with general context that opens your curiousity about other aspects of the system without overwhelming you.
If you pull on a thread you want to find a rope instead of getting blasted with a firehose.
GNU-Linux ( lemmy.blahaj.zone )
Me in the comments of any windows fuck up post Englisch
It's from an old game
Switched to linux before it became mainstream ( lemmy.world )
ich_iel ( files.catbox.moe )
Toxic linux communities moment:
Original Comic: https://thejenkinscomic.wordpress.com/
[CW: Death and Blood] The trolley problem USA edition ( lemmy.ml )