arstechnica , vor einem Monat Englisch Google accidentally published internal Search documentation to GitHub Commit snafu slapped an irrevocable Apache 2.0 license on confidential API Docs. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/06/google-accidentally-published-internal-search-documentation-to-github/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social
Google accidentally published internal Search documentation to GitHub
Commit snafu slapped an irrevocable Apache 2.0 license on confidential API Docs.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/06/google-accidentally-published-internal-search-documentation-to-github/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social
logickinlambda , vor einem Monat Englisch @arstechnica A thought though: Is there enough information to let us build an alternative search engine, by studying their documentation?
@arstechnica A thought though:
Is there enough information to let us build an alternative search engine, by studying their documentation?
blaise , vor einem Monat Englisch @arstechnica Alt Text: image of the multi colored Google logotype, placed diagonally across the screen.
@arstechnica Alt Text: image of the multi colored Google logotype, placed diagonally across the screen.
number6 , vor einem Monat Englisch @arstechnica It might be schadenfreude, but I sort of feel justified that the best brains in the business also find GitHub confusing.
@arstechnica
It might be schadenfreude, but I sort of feel justified that the best brains in the business also find GitHub confusing.
thesequesterednook , vor einem Monat Englisch @arstechnica 🤣 Was it by accident, though? Like some engineer tripped and oops posted company docs on GitHub? https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica/112554226166464171
@arstechnica 🤣 Was it by accident, though? Like some engineer tripped and oops posted company docs on GitHub?
https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica/112554226166464171