Len0w0ThinkBad , Englisch
@Len0w0ThinkBad@labyrinth.zone avatar

It really bugs me how so many people act as if there's a magic "click here to implement [feature]" button, and completely discount the fact that Free Software like Linux is largely developed by unpaid volunteers.

Yeah, sure, they shouldn't need money and resources to implement accessibility features, they are super simple! Every other OS* has them!

*(Windows and Mac, both developed by small mom and pop shops)

Len0w0ThinkBad OP ,
@Len0w0ThinkBad@labyrinth.zone avatar

"it being free is no excuse"

Fuck off. In an ideal world, no, it wouldn't be. But we live in a society. Things need funds to support the creators.

Sure big business invests in FOSS, but generally only for things they actively benefit from, which is generally not Linux on the desktop.

karolherbst ,
@karolherbst@chaos.social avatar

@Len0w0ThinkBad there is an interesting aspect to this and that's getting FOSS/Linux used by governments (as in, paying local IT firms instead of big corpo). However they usually have high requirements on accessibility, which ultimately ends with a chicken-egg problem, because only big companies (e.g. Red Hat) are able to promise on those aspects.

So there is some chicken-egg problem right here, but I think that's solvable if governments would be willing to invest big in Linux accessibility.

glitzersachen ,

@karolherbst @Len0w0ThinkBad

I have no problem with Redhat implementing accessibility features. After all they charge for their Linux related services.

  • Alle
  • Abonniert
  • Moderiert
  • Favoriten
  • random
  • haupteingang
  • Alle Magazine