@TechConnectify
I've had this experience in do many arguments in real life, most recently with trying to go car free in my mostly car dependent city. Even if you have an answer to each individual nitpick they don't care. the nitpicks cover up their desire to ignore the holistic argument
@TechConnectify it’s part of the law of internet pedantry. If someone asks “has there ever been product X with feature Y?” and you reply “no, not possible because [reasons]”, there will ALWAYS be someone who pipes in to say “Not true! Company XYZ made a prototype X with Y in 1978 so you’re WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!!” …even though it didn’t work, was never sold, destroyed crops, and violated the Geneva Convention. But the technicality compels them to do their sacred “You’re wrong!” dance.
@TechConnectify I would like to just make holistic arguments and get away with them, but sometimes a bunch of details I haven't considered will erode the contribution
some things just aren't that simple. if they were, i'd be able to publish a lot more papers
@TechConnectify I see that ALL THE TIME in my line of work. It’s how people try to show their value, and yes, it is very annoying. Remember, it’s easy to tear down. It’s much harder to create, especially something that’s meaningful and compelling.
@lienrag No, I'm saying that some facts which are important to one person's understanding of a situation may not actually be that important in the broader context. They're fixating on issues they know sometimes come up and not questioning whether those issues are pertinent to the discussion at hand.
Oftentimes these folks have specific knowledge which they don't understand is irrelevant in the moment. So they're arguing things which don't matter and they don't realize it.
I feel you. Sometimes it's good to use details as canary birds when testing an argument, but at some point you have to accept simplification of details if you want to actually get to the so-called beef.