arstechnica , vor einem Monat Englisch No one has seen the data behind Tyson’s “climate friendly beef” claim Millions of taxpayer dollars flow to livestock companies raising "low carbon" beef. https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/05/no-one-has-seen-the-data-behind-tysons-climate-friendly-beef-claim/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social
No one has seen the data behind Tyson’s “climate friendly beef” claim
Millions of taxpayer dollars flow to livestock companies raising "low carbon" beef.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/05/no-one-has-seen-the-data-behind-tysons-climate-friendly-beef-claim/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social
AlexsandraSmart , vor einem Monat Englisch @arstechnica Low carbon was never the main problem with beef. If they had boasted about low methane, or perhaps low nitrate runoff, that would be something.
@arstechnica Low carbon was never the main problem with beef. If they had boasted about low methane, or perhaps low nitrate runoff, that would be something.
darwinwoodka , vor einem Monat Englisch @arstechnica Tyson is an evil evil company. Do not buy.
@arstechnica Tyson is an evil evil company. Do not buy.
inkican , vor einem Monat Englisch @arstechnica It means they used fewer carbon-based lifeforms in production (Translation: Layoffs)
@arstechnica It means they used fewer carbon-based lifeforms in production (Translation: Layoffs)