HiddenLayer5 ,
@HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml avatar

Don't worry, they've outlawed homelessness. Problem solved!

JohnDClay ,

Literally though. And there's a whole practice of hostile architecture that makes it harder and more uncomfortable to be homeless.

Obi ,
@Obi@sopuli.xyz avatar

The point of hostile architecture isn't to solve homelessness, just to send them to the next block/town over (not saying you don't understand that, just pointing it out).

JohnDClay ,

I wonder if hostile architecture also kills people. Increasing exposure to cold and reducing opportunities to rest doesn't seem good for your chances for survival. I guess that would solve homelessness, but in the worst most morbid way possible.

Viking_Hippie ,

You're absolutely right in your suspicion. Like so many "let's punish the poor and vulnerable so they'll stop being poor and vulnerable" policies that people think are just a "righteous" inconvenience, hostile architecture DOES kill people.

It's social murder just so the more fortunate don't have to look at the consequences of an unjust system. https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/580eb047-85fc-4380-92ad-6e79e79a425b.jpeg

BB69 ,

I don’t think anybody thinks that.

Kichae ,

Not explicitly, maybe, but implicitly, absolutely, and in multiple ways:

  • Supporting the system that creates one over the other
  • Having 'bootstrap' attitudes about the poor
  • Worrying about property value over utilization
  • Complaining about the homeless rather than the lack of action on housing
  • Voting against people who run on public housing

In so, so many ways, people say they prefer the latter over the former. Usually just with the caveat that the homeless people also be invisible.

  • Alle
  • Abonniert
  • Moderiert
  • Favoriten
  • memes@lemmy.ml
  • random
  • haupteingang
  • Alle Magazine