I guess this isn’t news to anyone, but I just thought of it ( feddit.de ) Englisch

daltotron , vor 3 Monaten

You know, as much as I do like this website, I do find it kind of tiring how the top posts tend to just be like. Like this is an NPC meme, you know? This is a chad vs virgin type of meme. This is about a step away from choosing to portray your opposition as a soy wojack. Sometimes I find that kind of funny because of how absurdly idiotic and brainbroken it reveals the creator of the meme to have been, but I dunno, something about the mainstream adoption of this kind of thing is just kind of incredibly depressing. It's like I am seeing the mainstream consciousness break apart in real time.

Can we go back to advice animals and rage comics, guys?

Flax_vert , vor 3 Monaten

Yes and we should. We should also make childcare free.

damnedfurry , vor 3 Monaten

It can't be free.

What you're actually saying is that "childcare should be communally funded by taxes".

I'm not on board with that unless it comes with limits on reproduction, especially for those who pay zero taxes.

Stop creating more human lives when you can't even independently support your own.

Flax_vert , vor 3 Monaten

We should prioritise supporting the creation of more human lives

camelbeard , vor 3 Monaten

First of all you'll be really happy with all those babies when you turn 80 and society hasn't fallen because the average age is 70.

Second, when childcare is free more people can join the workforce, this increases taxes and productivity.

But maybe the most important it will make society more equal. When you're poor working almost doesn't make sense if you have to spend 80% of your salary on childcare. So more people don't work, these people are usually women. That really doesn't help with an equal society, because a big group can't really work so they can't really climb any ladders.

lath , vor 3 Monaten

A lot of the issues here can be side-stepped with proper sexual education classes.

scrubbles , vor 3 Monaten

Conservatives want live babies to grow up to be dead soldiers. George Carlin

CableMonster , vor 3 Monaten

Maybe true in the 90s, but now the liberals seem to be just as war hungry.

ristoril_zip , vor 3 Monaten

It's fascinating that this isn't something that is always thrown back in the so called "pro life" person's face. They're only pro birth. They don't care if the baby that comes out is fed, clothed, housed, eventually educated, etc. Or at least, they don't believe there's any collective responsibility to take care of that baby.

Flax_vert , vor 3 Monaten

That's a strawman. We do.

feine_seife , vor 3 Monaten

You do. But not the politicians who actually get it into law.
Also who has decided you are the spokesperson of the pro life movement?

CableMonster , vor 3 Monaten

The problem is there is a completely different perspective here. I dont want politicians to give people things like welfare not because I hate people, but because I think it turns them into dependents, and I think it actively harms them.

feine_seife , vor 3 Monaten

I agree that incorrect administration of welfare can lead to that. But thats also the politicians job to manage.

Thats also comparable to saying I don't visit doctors I fear a mistreatment.

CableMonster , vor 3 Monaten

Its too big or a job for a politian to manage, it has to be run well at the street level.

Going to the doctor is a bad analogy, it would be more apt to compare it to someone taking pain medication because their back hurts, and they get hooked on the pain pills, but the reason their back hurts is because they are morbidly obese. We need to go after the problem, not enable the problem.

feine_seife , vor 3 Monaten

That is true we need to fix the problem. So in your analogy you would've stopped giving the person pain medication?

And how is the person crippled by pain supposed to stand, walk or excercise without pain medication?

I get it addition to pain medication is bad. I would assume most people know that, even those addicted. But the alternative is those people succumbing to pain, which would prevent any improvments.

Hence, yes I agree. Just throwing around money is not going to be the solution, but so is also not giving any.

CableMonster , vor 3 Monaten

Sorry, if you are not able to apply that analogy, I dont care to re explain every scenerio.

Pandantic , vor 3 Monaten

More proof it’s more punishment than concern for the baby. To them, sex is a sin unless for procreation and your punishment for having sex for fun or while poor (or sexually assaulted) is that you have to bear the burden because you sinned. They can’t handle their own sexual shit because it’s not allowed to be talked about, so they make us all deal with it. She doesn’t want to have her 3rd baby, but she’s a good Christian woman who can’t say no to her husband, so she has to have it, and she wants other women to have to have it too. The fawning over babies and speaking to the “sacredness of life” is the facade they wear because it sounds more “Christian”.

Oh that and, male power over women’s bodies. Because, you never know, that mystery pregnancy you got after the club might just be Jesus! Zeus came as coins ffs, so God may appear to the new Mary as rohypnol. Who knows?