I said government funding for transit should focus mainly on rail as that would actually reduce pollution.
As would BEVs
Private entities should obviously be free to develop EVs
You were saying they shouldn't have roads to drive on.
but I never advocated for the removal of busses, ambulances, firefighters and enviourmental regulations. Where the fuck did you even get that, or are you arguing with someone else?
They require road infrastructure, which you said we should do away with.
EV adoption would take far longer than decades
EV adoption is happening right now.
We're likely hundreds of years away from removing road travel.
If you want EV mass adoption there needs to be used EVs available for around 5000 to 2000 euros
We're already going to get EV mass adoption. It's happening now and will continue. And 2000 to 5000? Lol, pull the other one. Cars cost far far far more than that and they're everywhere. You're just making up nonsense, again.
To fix climate change you don't need to serve literally everyone with EVs
Point me to where I said that. I've said the opposite. Stop with this strawman bullshit.
you need to reduce emissions enough and rail would serve the transit needs of more people than EVs ever could so that's where I want government funding for transit to go to.
Rail is part of it. As are BEVs. Like I said. Are you even reading?
You seem to be more in the camp that we need a perfect solution that serves every person on the planet but EVs can't even do that.
No, I'm in the realistic camp. You're in the fantasy camp. "Just get rid of cars and everyone have rail, we can build rail to everybody's houses within 5 years extremely cheaply!!"